本地部署大语言模型-DeepSeek

DeepSeek 是国内顶尖 AI 团队「深度求索」开发的多模态大模型，具备数学推理、代码生成等深度能力，堪称"AI界的六边形战士"。

Hostease AMD 9950X/96G/3.84T NVMe/1G/5IP/RTX4090 GPU服务器提供多种计费模式。

DeepSeek-R1-32B配置

配置项	规格要求
CPU	16 核以上（如 AMD Ryzen 9950）
内存	96GB
硬盘	960GB
显卡	24GB+ 显存（如 RTX 4090）

# cat cpuinfo |grep name|head -1
model name : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor

apt update
apt install nvidia-driver-535 -y
curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
ollama run deepseek-r1:32b-qwen-distill-q4_K_M --verbose

创建对话返回结果

>>> which is bigger,9.8 or 9.11?
<think>
Alright, so I'm trying to figure out whether 9.8 is bigger than 9.11 or not. At first glance, it seems like both numbers are pretty close to each 
other since they both start with a 9 and then have some decimal parts. But wait, maybe there's something more to it.Okay, let me break this down step by step. First, I need to understand what these decimals represent. So, 9.8 can be read as nine plus eight 
tenths, right? And 9.11 is nine plus eleven hundredths. Hmm, that makes sense. Now, the question is asking which one is bigger.Maybe it would help if I line them up vertically to compare the digits after the decimal point more easily:```9.809.11
```By adding a zero to 9.8 to make it 9.80, we can see that both numbers have two decimal places now. This should make the comparison straightforward.Now, let's look at the tenths place first:- For 9.80, the tenths digit is 8.
- For 9.11, the tenths digit is 1.Okay, so right here, it seems like 8 is greater than 1. That would mean that 9.80 is bigger because its tenths place is larger than the tenths 
place of 9.11.But wait a second—is there something else I should consider? Maybe rounding or anything like that?Well, since both numbers are already given to two decimal places and we've added an extra zero to make them consistent, I think it's safe to say 
that no further adjustment is necessary.Still, just to be thorough, let me convert these decimals into fractions to see if there's a difference in their values.For 9.80:- 0.80 as a fraction is the same as \( \frac{80}{100} \), which simplifies down to \( \frac{4}{5} \).So, 9.80 is equal to \( 9 + \frac{4}{5} = \frac{45}{5} + \frac{4}{5} = \frac{49}{5} \).For 9.11:- 0.11 as a fraction is approximately \( \frac{11}{100} \).So, 9.11 is equal to \( 9 + \frac{11}{100} = \frac{900}{100} + \frac{11}{100} = \frac{911}{100} \).Now, let's compare these two fractions:- \( \frac{49}{5} = 9.8 \)
- \( \frac{911}{100} = 9.11 \)To see which one is bigger, I can convert both to have the same denominator or find a common basis for comparison.Let's try finding equivalent fractions with the same denominator:The denominators are 5 and 100. Since 100 is a multiple of 5 (specifically, \( \frac{100}{5} = 20 \)), I'll convert both fractions to have a 
denominator of 100.For \( \frac{49}{5} \):- Multiply numerator and denominator by 20: \( \frac{49 \times 20}{5 \times 20} = \frac{980}{100} \).So, \( \frac{49}{5} = \frac{980}{100} \).Now we have:- \( \frac{980}{100} \) (which is 9.8)
- \( \frac{911}{100} \) (which is 9.11)Comparing the numerators directly, since both fractions have the same denominator:- 980 > 911This means that \( \frac{980}{100} > \frac{911}{100} \), or in other words, 9.8 is greater than 9.11.Wait a minute—this contradicts what I thought earlier where the tenths place indicated that 9.8 was bigger because of having an 8 instead of a 1 in 
the tenths place. But when converting to fractions with the same denominator, it's clear that even though both numbers have nine as their whole 
number part, the decimal parts make a difference.But according to my calculations:- 9.8 is larger than 9.11 because \( \frac{49}{5} \) (or \( \frac{980}{100} \)) is greater than \( \frac{911}{100} \).So, this further confirms that 9.8 is bigger.Is there anything else I need to consider? Maybe looking at the hundredths place?Well, since we've already converted both numbers to have the same denominator and confirmed that 9.8 has a larger numerator in the hundredths place 
as well (\( \frac{980}{100} \) vs. \( \frac{911}{100} \)), I think we can confidently say that 9.8 is indeed bigger than 9.11.Additionally, thinking about it on a number line might help visualize this:- If you imagine the numbers from 9 to 10:- 9.8 would be closer to 10.- 9.11 would be much closer to 9.Therefore, 9.8 is further along towards 10 and thus larger than 9.11.But just to ensure there's no mistake in the fraction conversion, let me double-check:- \( \frac{49}{5} = 9.8 \) since \( 49 ÷ 5 = 9.8 \).That seems correct because 5 times 9 is 45, and 49 minus 45 leaves a remainder of 4, so \( \frac{4}{5} = 0.8 \), making it 9.8.And for \( \frac{911}{100} \):- \( 911 ÷ 100 = 9.11 \).Yes, that's accurate because dividing by 100 moves the decimal point two places to the left.So everything checks out mathematically.Is there any alternative way to think about this?Perhaps considering money as an analogy:- If you have $9.80 and $9.11:- You'd obviously have more with $9.80 than with $9.11.This real-world scenario aligns with the mathematical conclusion that 9.8 is bigger.Alternatively, think of it in terms of measurements:- If something measures 9.8 centimeters and another measures 9.11 centimeters:- The first one would be longer than the second one.All these analogies reinforce the idea that 9.8 is indeed larger than 9.11.So, after carefully analyzing through different methods—decimal comparison, fraction conversion, number line visualization, and real-life 
analogies—it becomes clear that 9.8 is bigger than 9.11.
</think>To determine which number is larger between \( 9.8 \) and \( 9.11 \), we can follow these steps:1. **Understand the Numbers**:- \( 9.8 \) is equivalent to \( 9.80 \).- Both numbers have a whole number part of 9.2. **Compare the Decimal Parts**:- The decimal part of \( 9.8 \) (or \( 9.80 \)) is 0.80.- The decimal part of \( 9.11 \) is 0.11.- Since \( 0.80 > 0.11 \), the decimal part of \( 9.8 \) is larger.3. **Conclusion**:- Therefore, \( 9.8 \) is bigger than \( 9.11 \).Final Answer:  
\[
\boxed{9.8}
\]eval count:           501 token(s)
eval duration:        12.478s
eval rate:            40.15 tokens/s>>>

Web页面返回对话，2个数字比大小结果